On Mon, 18 Mar 2002 19:28:59 -0800 John W Baxter <John> wrote: > (Unlimited reply to headers sounds like a great way to get a Spam > multiplier effect, but that wasn't a consideration at RFC writing > time.)
RFC 2822 explicitly states that Reply-To can contain a list of headers. RFC 822 is more ambiguous. To my mind this single fact (if used with Reply-To aggregation) obviates most of the arguments in the Reply-To Munging Considered Harmful document. -- J C Lawrence ---------(*) Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas. [EMAIL PROTECTED] He lived as a devil, eh? http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/ Evil is a name of a foeman, as I live. _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
