On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 08:12:54PM -0800, J C Lawrence wrote: > On Mon, 18 Mar 2002 19:28:59 -0800 > John W Baxter <John> wrote: > > > (Unlimited reply to headers sounds like a great way to get a Spam > > multiplier effect, but that wasn't a consideration at RFC writing > > time.) > > RFC 2822 explicitly states that Reply-To can contain a list of > headers. RFC 822 is more ambiguous. To my mind this single fact (if > used with Reply-To aggregation) obviates most of the arguments in the > Reply-To Munging Considered Harmful document.
The Linux Answer Gang list at ssc.com uses multi-player Reply-to's. It confused me at first, because I keep Mutt set to prompt, and it only prompts for the *first* address in the list -- subsequently giving you and edit-mode prompt showing all the reply-to's, which it handles correctly. Cheers, - jra -- Jay R. Ashworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] Member of the Technical Staff Baylink RFC 2100 The Suncoast Freenet The Things I Think Tampa Bay, Florida http://baylink.pitas.com +1 727 647 1274 "If you don't have a dream; how're you gonna have a dream come true?" -- Captain Sensible, The Damned (from South Pacific's "Happy Talk") _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
