Nick Simicich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> asserts that AOL will silently discard mail which lists multiple addresses in Reply-To:, one of which matches From: and is an AOL address. Later in that thread:
------- Forwarded Message From: "David W. Tamkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "list-managers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: multiple addresses in (was AOL and odd) Reply-to Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 20:01:35 -0500 Nick gave the example, | > Reply-to: listname@listdomain, [EMAIL PROTECTED] JCL commented, | Having [mutiple addresses in] Reply-To is a Good ... and Damned Useful [Thing]. It seems to me, though, that the list membership would be better served with this form: Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] because the MUAs with which I'm familiar make it anywhere from slightly easier to far easier for the respondent to remove addresses from the right of the reply's To: than from the left. ------- End of Forwarded Message -- J C Lawrence ---------(*) Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas. [EMAIL PROTECTED] He lived as a devil, eh? http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/ Evil is a name of a foeman, as I live. _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman-21/listinfo/mailman-developers
