On Tue, 16 Jul 2002 22:57:44 -0700 
Chuq Von Rospach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/16/02 10:36 PM, "J C Lawrence" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>> Nick Simicich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> asserts that AOL will silently
>> discard mail which lists multiple addresses in Reply-To:, one of
>> which matches From: and is an AOL address.  Later in that thread:

> AOL silently blackholes stuff that trips its spam filters.

> I can easily see, given the recent spate of spam with forged headers
> to look like it's coming FROM someone (or you) @ your domain to
> someone (or you) @ your domain, that comes from off-site, that AOL has
> decided that anything that looks to be from an AOL account but coming
> from outside the AOL universe is probably spam. Because, probably, it
> is.

If, as has been suggested, AOL users can't normally set Reply-To:, such
a check on Reply-To is also quite valid (or damned close enough for
AOL's uses).

> It's basically hit a point where it's unsafe to accept mail "from"
> your domain unless it's explicitly coming from a trusted SMTP
> source. And yes, that screws over someone (like me) who owns a domain
> on a box somewhere, and who goes on the road and uses a dialup like
> earthlink and wants to continue using his real domain in his
> email. 

Do *NOT* talk to me about POP before SMTP.  I repeat, DO NOT...

<Atrociously horrible hack>

> But the spammers are now exploiting that, so you're going to see
> everyone lock it down tight, both on the receiving side, and (with
> responsible ISPs) the sending side (by limiting what domain names
> they'll propogate outward)

Bingo.  I've already started seeing this.

-- 
J C Lawrence                
---------(*)                Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas. 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]               He lived as a devil, eh?              
http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/  Evil is a name of a foeman, as I live.


_______________________________________________
Mailman-Developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman-21/listinfo/mailman-developers

Reply via email to