On Tue, 16 Jul 2002 23:15:24 -0700 Chuq Von Rospach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/16/02 10:59 PM, "J C Lawrence" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> How about the CGI business as a solution? You can do that without >> exposing the address and while doing due diligence on constraining >> abuse. > Once you build the infrastructure to support cloaked-but-forwarding > addresses, it's definitely possible. But not 1st generation stuff, I > don't think. True. Its a pretty clean v2 tho, and with a short runway between v1 and v2. >> ObNote: Apple runs a large enough mail ship that its an attractive >> target in and of itself should you do an automated system like this. > Shh. If you don't tell anyone... (oh, wait, security through obscurity > is a bad idea...) There are many problems which become clearly non-linear purely due to the Big Number effect. SPAM is one of those problems on all three ends of the equation. -- J C Lawrence ---------(*) Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas. [EMAIL PROTECTED] He lived as a devil, eh? http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/ Evil is a name of a foeman, as I live. _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman-21/listinfo/mailman-developers
