On Wed, 17 Jul 2002 11:27:27 -0400 Jay R Ashworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 10:47:55PM -0700, J C Lawrence wrote: >> On Tue, 16 Jul 2002 22:34:51 -0700 Chuq Von Rospach
>> Is that really a valid and interesting case that can't be (usually) >> handled by posting directly to the list? > Absolutely, positively, 100% guaranteed. > Think Google. Think 5-year old message with *almost* exactly the > answer you need. Think "hasn't been on that mailing list in 2 years, > since a bogus bounce dropped me and I didn't bother re-upping." Yup, which is a small enough probability of happening, with a small enough population who might even/ever want to do that, with a small enough probability of the original address even remaining valid over that time...etc that I don't see it as much of an interesting case. The (nicer) thing is that it also handles given a CGI which does reply-to-list from the web archives. ObNote: I have that feature on the archives at Kanga.Nu. -- J C Lawrence ---------(*) Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas. [EMAIL PROTECTED] He lived as a devil, eh? http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/ Evil is a name of a foeman, as I live. _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman-21/listinfo/mailman-developers
