On Wed, 17 Jul 2002 03:33:25 -0400 Barry A Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>> "JCL" == J C Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: JCL> Nothing. BUT, if the addresses are date limited the number of JCL> addresses in the valid pool is going to tend to be small (ie number JCL> of posters within the last window). This perforce forces SPAM JCL> harvesters to constant updating of their lists and a resultant huge JCL> rate of bad addresses. > Plus, if you do server alias replacement, you have another technique > at your disposal -- you can quarantine messages for some amount of > time and watch for multiple copies to your aliases. List admins would > be able to move the lever between more immediate delivery and longer > quarantines as an anti-spam device. Oooooooooo! I like it. The delay wouldn't even have to be large as the typical volumes would be small (thus making the overhead manageable). A couple hours would be just fine for >80% of the cases. -- J C Lawrence ---------(*) Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas. [EMAIL PROTECTED] He lived as a devil, eh? http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/ Evil is a name of a foeman, as I live. _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman-21/listinfo/mailman-developers
