> "[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" is not legal under RFC 2822. It is > must not generate under either current (section 3) or obsolete (section > 4) grammar.
true, it's illegal to have an '@' in a phrase unless its quoted. it was illegal in RFC 822 also, which means it's been illegal for 20 years or so. an '@' can't appear in an atom. perhaps even worse, it's redundant. why say [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> or even "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> when simply [EMAIL PROTECTED] will do? a phrase containing another copy of the address conveys no additional information, it just wastes bandwidth and invites stupid mail handling tools to play with it. Keith _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman-21/listinfo/mailman-developers
