FYI, Outlook with Exchange Server 2000, does the "right thing". Here's
the To lines on an outgoing message:
From: "Dan Kohn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- dan
--
Dan Kohn <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://www.dankohn.com/> <tel:+1-650-327-2600>
-----Original Message-----
From: Keith Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 13:38
To: Terri Oda
Cc: Dan Wing; Keith Moore; Dan Kohn; Jay R. Ashworth;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Developers]
[[EMAIL PROTECTED]:Undeliverable Mail]
> Actually, the offending client in this case is Sylpheed, much as I'd
like to
> blame outlook. (goodness knows, I blame it for Klez.)
I take it Sylpheed is the one that generates bogus phrases?
> I'd have to find someone with a copy of outlook to try it and be sure,
but I
> think outlook does "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> which probably
> wouldn't have been a problem.
it might be syntactically legal, but it's still utterly stupid.
Keith
_______________________________________________
Mailman-Developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman-21/listinfo/mailman-developers
