>>>>> "JRM" == Jason R Mastaler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Yes, and because we currently have no database that's shared
>> across mailing lists. Issues I don't want to think about
>> include concurrent access to a shared database.
JRM> This assumes all the functionality is built into MM, rather
JRM> than hooking TMDA into MM. In the latter case, it wouldn't
JRM> matter whether MM had the shared db, as the lookup would come
JRM> from an external source.
So if we /don't/ build the functionality into MM2.1 (as Chuq is so
sensibly arguing :) is there anything we need to do to implement the
whitelisting TMDA fronted MM that is being proposed here?
If so, let's talk about that. If not, maybe we're done. :)
-Barry
_______________________________________________
Mailman-Developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman-21/listinfo/mailman-developers
