On Mon, 29 Jul 2002 20:55:27 -0600 Jason R Mastaler <Jason> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Barry A. Warsaw) writes:
>> So if we /don't/ build the functionality into MM2.1 (as Chuq is so >> sensibly arguing :) is there anything we need to do to implement the >> whitelisting TMDA fronted MM that is being proposed here? > I think we just need documentation. I've only ever combined MM and > TMDA under qmail, and it's quite easy. Given .qmail-list which posts > to the list, you just need to edit and add the following to the top of > the file: I have TMDA+Mailman (with MIME filters and other niceties) working under Exim. Doing the same under Postfix is a bit of a bitch due to effective UID/GID problems for executing pipe, but can be solved with the vtable trick detailed in the Postfix README. If you decide _NOT_ to roll TMDA-like features into v2.1 I'll continue with my project and should post documentation, scripts, and other relevant bits here in the next week or so. > Non-qmail MTAs aren't as flexible, so perhaps JC can comment on his > experiences? Mostly its as commented here and on the TMDA lists (macro limitations etc). There's a little problem with effective UID/GID for gaining access to the Mailman config.db, but that's a trivial problem under Exim if you follow the Exim HowTo as a base model. > In any case, I think the necessary changes (if any) would go into TMDA > and not MM. So, perhaps you are done. Yeah, plus a little plugin logic (eg web UI). -- J C Lawrence ---------(*) Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas. [EMAIL PROTECTED] He lived as a devil, eh? http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/ Evil is a name of a foeman, as I live. _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman-21/listinfo/mailman-developers
