Chuq Von Rospach wrote: > On 7/30/02 9:40 AM, "Dan Mick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>Do you mean that the premise, >>"the email address is either inaccessible or inaccessible just to >>ADA folks" is not valid? > > > No, I don't. Programmatically obfuscating an email address still makes that > obfuscated email address available to a reader app for a sight-limited > person. So at least he gets something that can be interpreted. If you put it > in a graphic, since you can't (by definition) put readable content in the > ALT tag, that person ends up with a big empty, which means it's no longer > accessible.
That sounds like a "yes the premise is invalid", not a "no". Ka-Ping said "if you make the address inaccessible to all, that's worse than making it inaccessible only to ADA folks, so the latter is a net win." You're apparently assuming that there is no acceptable solution that will make the address inaccessible to all, which is a reasonable assumption, but not what Ka-Ping was saying. _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman-21/listinfo/mailman-developers
