Chuq Von Rospach wrote: > On 7/30/02 10:10 AM, "Dan Mick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>That sounds like a "yes the premise is invalid", not a "no". > > > Thank you for explaining to me what I said, because otherwise, I wouldn't > have known what it was I was saying.
Oh, for Christ's sake, Chuq, isn't someone allowed to ask you to clarify, because they're just Far Stupider than You? Damn. I was trying to add clarification rather than snottiness, and you just refuse. _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman-21/listinfo/mailman-developers
