J C Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Note: SF is likely going to have severe performance problems with
> the current flatfile list implementation.  Odds are that they're
> going to want a persistent SQL-backed implementation due to their
> size.

What flatfile list implementation are you referring to?

-- 
(http://tmda.net/)



_______________________________________________
Mailman-Developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman-21/listinfo/mailman-developers

Reply via email to