On Tue, 30 Jul 2002 11:47:07 -0600 Jason R Mastaler <Jason> wrote: > J C Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Note: SF is likely going to have severe performance problems with the >> current flatfile list implementation. Odds are that they're going to >> want a persistent SQL-backed implementation due to their size.
> What flatfile list implementation are you referring to? I failed to noticed the cdb/dbm/etc list code. Ooops. -- J C Lawrence ---------(*) Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas. [EMAIL PROTECTED] He lived as a devil, eh? http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/ Evil is a name of a foeman, as I live. _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman-21/listinfo/mailman-developers
