On Mon, 14 Oct 2002 23:28:48 -0700 Chuq Von Rospach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's the problem. From points to the author. To points to me. In > this case, they're both the same, but... Translation: A post which was BCC'ed to a list. > I realize we're against co-ercing reply-to, but I think this has > gotten a bit extreme. > Shouldn't the list be in the CC: line? Arguable. It really depends on your view of BCCs and lists, and whether you consider them a Good and Useful thing, or an annoyance of the devil. cf followup-to in netnews. The principle of minimum invasion (ie lists should dick with headers as little as possible) says that BCC'ed posts should stay BCC'ed. The principle or minimum surprise likely says (there's debate) that some version of a reply (and RFC 2369 probably doesn't count) should enclude the list. You get to pick. -- J C Lawrence ---------(*) Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas. [EMAIL PROTECTED] He lived as a devil, eh? http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/ Evil is a name of a foeman, as I live. _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman-21/listinfo/mailman-developers
