On Tuesday, October 15, 2002, at 09:54 AM, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
> 1. Stick the list posting address back in the To header and probably > not include the recipient's address in a mail header. my first preference. > > 2. Leave the recip's address in To, but add a CC back to the list my second choice. Both of these re-enable what I think is "right" here -- reply to author, reply-all to author and list. > > 3. Munge Reply-To so that the list's address gets in there somehow I don't like this -- because it removes the reply/reply-to dichotomy above. > So I'm inclined to add #2, but only if reply_goes_to_list isn't "This > List", since I don't think you need the list address in there twice. > that seems to me best compromise. If you don't coerce reply-to, stick the list in CC so the replies work right. If you DO coerce reply-to, then it takes precedence and leave it alone. > How's that different than what we do now (modulo one of the fixes > above)? > It's not... -- Chuq Von Rospach, Architech [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.plaidworks.com/chuqui/blog/ No! No! Dead girl, OFF the table! -- Shrek _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman-21/listinfo/mailman-developers
