On Tue, 2006-01-03 at 12:21 +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > BAW> I find that my typical approach is to scan the summary, > BAW> opening any potential ham > > I assume you mean "ham = on-topic, spam = off-topic, possibly but not > necessarily UCE"?
In this context, yep! > Our lists don't have a topicality problem, so I don't think I've ever > had need to open a post. The summary subject invariably shows spam > vs. ham. Often, but not always. I probably find myself tricked about 10% of the time. ;) > Unfortunately, you can't open a subscription request. I > know, the text doesn't show much in most cases, but we could look for > header forging. I don't understand why this distinction was made; > would it cost resources to give access to the subscription requests? Probably not. I'm sure there was a "good" reason buried in history, but it's not a bad idea to revisit this. -Barry
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp
