Tokio Kikuchi wrote:
>
>We may have to patch against this email package parsedate bug.
>I've just uploaded a patch on SF tracker. Please someone review this
>before I commit in the CVS (this weekend, maybe).
I have looked at the patch in the tracker.
Caveat: I haven't tested anything - this is just based on my reading.
I think the patch is good. The issue I see is that Scrubber.py may not
currently be doing the right thing if parsedate() returns None.
Consider the attached patch for Scrubber.py in addition to the patch in
the tracker.
--
Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan
--- Handlers/Scrubber.py 2006-01-28 21:22:03.000000000 -0800
+++ Handlers/Scrubber.py 2006-01-30 17:58:31.890625000 -0800
@@ -124,10 +124,11 @@
# archives/private/<listname>/attachments/YYYYMMDD/<msgid-hash>/<files>
# Start by calculating the date-based and msgid-hash components.
fmt = '%Y%m%d'
+ now = None
datestr = msg.get('Date')
if datestr:
now = parsedate(datestr)
- else:
+ if not now:
now = time.gmtime(msgdata.get('received_time', time.time()))
datedir = safe_strftime(fmt, now)
if not datedir:
_______________________________________________
Mailman-Developers mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org
Security Policy:
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp
