Ethan wrote:
> Note that this would be in *addition* to the ability to get a JS-free
> version of the interface by using a different URL prefix for any user
> agent that doesn't want the JS action.
Speaking only for myself, this is not the kind of approach I'd like to see
used. I'd prefer to see the web application auto-detect that JavaScript
is not available, and therefore to automatically present the appropriate
non-JavaScript interface. Likewise, it should auto-detect that there is a
screen reader being used, and present the appropriate screen reader
compatible interface.
Of course, the manual options should always be there, but if we're forcing
the user to manually select a different page in order to get away from the
JavaScript stuff, then I think we're doing something wrong.
--
Brad Knowles, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790), reply of the Pennsylvania
Assembly to the Governor, November 11, 1755
LOPSA member since December 2005. See <http://www.lopsa.org/>.
_______________________________________________
Mailman-Developers mailing list
Mailman-Developers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org
Security Policy:
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp
