Thank you for the correction, David. --John
On 7/5/06 5:07 PM, "David Andrews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That assertion is not true, to my knowledge -- and I am a screen reader user. > Because it does work with a lot of things, and does offer improved > functionality, it is rare to turn Javascript off. > > David Andrews > > At 01:54 PM 7/5/2006, John W. Baxter wrote: >> On 7/5/06 11:26 AM, "emf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> The problem I face is not when JavaScript is not active, the problem is >>> when JavaScript *is* active *and* behaves correctly - i.e. performs the >>> dom modification I've told it to - but the browser/screen reader doesn't >>> bother to tell the user. >>> >>> ~ethan fremen >> >> Does the industry (I almost wrote "do we") know how big a problem this is in >> practice? That is, what fraction of users of screen readers and other >> assistive stuff routinely run with JavaScript active? >> >> Since the assertion here is "screenreaders have trouble with JavaScript" I >> would expect most screenreader users to have JavaScript turned off. >> >> --John _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list Mailman-Developers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp
