> Am Mittwoch, den 24.01.2007, 20:13 -0500 schrieb Dan MacNeil: >> Joachim Breitner wrote: >>> Alternatively, a message to a members-only mailing list could >>> automatically trigger a subscribe challenge that, if acted upon, not >>> only subscribes the sender, but also approves the held-back message.
Dan writes: >> I often miss stuff but near as I can tell this would be a bad thing. Joe >> Job/backscatter wise. [examples snipped] > Joachim writes: > Currently, Joe would get N messages telling him that he is not > subscribed. If he marks these as spam we get the same result, don’t we? > Thus adding a “self-approve mail” link or a “subscribe” link to this > message this scenario is not any more likely. Is this is true if the moderator has clicked "Discard" rather than "Hold" or "Reject" ? If not, I'd argue the current setup is imperfect. _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list Mailman-Developers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp
