Jo Rhett writes: > This is not substantive, it's trivial.
*sigh* From the point of view of the release manager, there are no trivial code changes to a release candidate. You are handicapping your advocacy by failing to acknowledge the potential for trouble. Adding a README.backscatter would be trivial. Would you like to provide it, since you evidently know how to make the configuration changes needed? In any case, it's hard to sympathize with your claim of urgency. Mark's intention to release 2.1.10 has been known for many months. This proposal comes on the eve of release. Code changes to implement it can, and should, wait for the next release. _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list Mailman-Developers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp
