On Mar 4, 2008, at 6:00 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > In any case, it's hard to sympathize with your claim of urgency. > Mark's intention to release 2.1.10 has been known for many months. > This proposal comes on the eve of release. Code changes to implement > it can, and should, wait for the next release.
What? I'm sorry, but Mailman has been blamed for backscatter for like 3 years going now. This problem has been well known for long before 2.1.10 was even dreamed of. I am asking that the developers start paying attention *NOW*. If the problems aren't going to be solved before 2.2, then we're going to put Mailman in the same bin as qmail and say that using it is a violation of the AUP. -- Jo Rhett Net Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open source and other randomness _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list Mailman-Developers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp
