Cristóbal Palmer writes: > Back in January I told our 500+ list admins that they could do this: > > > http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/ibiblio-announce/2008-January/000210.html > > And as of yesterday (27 of March) fewer than 20 had done > anything. Yesterday I ran a script that imposed that filtering on all > lists because we have been blacklisted by spamcop yet again. The > message we were blacklisted for had been tagged as spam by SA on the > list server, but still got bounced out to an innocent 3rd party (who > then reported us).
Why not just enforce this in SpamAssassin? If you've got lists that require special treatment and have trustworthy admins, get a plan from them and then add a rule that gives them a -5 or -10 bonus so that only really egregious spam gets automatically discarded, and the rest gets handled by the list- specific mechanism. You could also enable the per-address configs in SA itself. I don't see anything in this story that couldn't be done just as well with central control via SA at the MTA. _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list Mailman-Developers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp
