Mark Sapiro writes: > As I posted earlier Mailman does not archive a message with an > X-No-Archive: header. It doesn't look at the content which could be yes, > no, empty or anything else. This is deliberate.
Yes, I understand that, and the fact that the code uses .has_key makes it clear that it's deliberate. I'm asking whether non-Mailman- developers have an opinion, and more important (since I expect non- developers to say "Gee, I dunno ... whatever you think" :-), whether the mail-archive.com folks can tell something from their corpus. (I've checked my own folders and xemacs's: found *one*. From Dec 1999. :-) > X-No-Archive: no > > apparently does occur in the wild, if we can confirm that the semantics > of this should be 'do archive', file a bug and I'll fix it. Yup. _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
