On 02/12/2015 06:26 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > > So I think we can conclude that (1) individuals who intentionally use > "X-No-Archive: no" are *extremely* rare, and (2) the example of these > lists doesn't provide any guidance to Mailman since Mailman provides > no facility for generating X-No-Archive itself.
Not completely true. Mailman 2.1.x adds X-No-Archive: yes to monthly and on demand password reminders and list welcome messages (i.e. mailman generated messages containing user passwords), but I think you probably mean a list setting or something based on list settings to cause X-No-Archive: yes to be put in outgoing posts and digests > Maybe it should? Ie, for lists with "private" archives, maybe it > would be a good idea to add "X-No-Archive: yes" to the header to > advise chained lists not to archive? Maybe. I would be interested in what others think of this idea. -- Mark Sapiro <[email protected]> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
