On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 4:08 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull <step...@xemacs.org> wrote:
> Ah, that's a problem. I don't have control of the DNS yet. We'd need > to interact with Mark. So should a new conversation be started with Mark for our request? > I'll get you on the > arc-interop list, there should be another one in the summer at the > pace they've been going. > Okay! > Not really. Keywords that might be useful aside from ARC, DKIM, and > DMARC: mail, post, verify, track, key, sign, identity. > > Ah -- one brainstorm -- kimpy = "key identified mail.py". > > That sounds good! The `mail` keyword gave an idea - `emailauthentication` As far as words go, you could just keep dkimpy, too, since ARC depends > on domain keys for its semantics, as well as on DKIM for its signing > protocol. "adkimpy"? Lots of double meanings there: Aditya, ARC, > augmented, domain, divikar. :-) > > Hahaha! In case we choose that, that can be our inside joke. Narrowing it down, we have the options - dkimpy, kimpy, adkimpy ( meaning augmented/arc - domain ;) ), emailauthentication, and any others with keywords you specified. > I was surprised by the news, but Google also chose dkimpy for its > implementation of ARC. I haven't had time to look at it, but maybe > early next week (not publicly licensed, sorry, no URL). > I had read on the arc list that an OpenARC implementation was being developed by Murray Kucherawy. So I suppose that we may have the news of it being released on the list soon. Aditya _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list Mailman-Developers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
