Aditya Divekar writes: > So should a new conversation be started with Mark for > our request?
I/we need to find out exactly what we need. We may want to do this through email-test.python.org (no-existent, for example, python.org is the relevant part, or maybe a private domain of someone's), but we have to be careful that it doesn't conflict with other uses. > That sounds good! The `mail` keyword gave an idea - > `emailauthentication` I think that would need to be shortened, but mailauth would work and has a good rhythm. :-) Of course it may be "taken". > I had read on the arc list that an OpenARC implementation was being > developed by Murray Kucherawy. So I suppose that we may have the > news of it being released on the list soon. Yes, but Murray's OpenDKIM is a C library, and I expect OpenArc is too. I don't think we should be using a C library because we're not an MTA, and I suspect it will be making assumptions (eg, availability of SPF) that we shouldn't. In any case, the more independent implementations the better. Steve _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list Mailman-Developers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
