I get your point mark making a joint record is important like if an address
has 1 bounce each from n lists then the number should be n and we should
delete it instead saying the number is 1 for each and we should not take
any action.

On Tue, 12 Mar 2019, 23:00 Mark Sapiro, <m...@msapiro.net> wrote:

> On 3/12/19 10:01 AM, Aaryan Bhagat wrote:
> > Thanks for the guidance mark!
> >
> > Also
> >> The additional complexity is because an address may be subscribed to
> more than one list and optimum values for settings such as
> bounce_score_threshold and bounce_info_stale_after depend on list traffic
> patterns. Compromises will need to be made.
> >
> >
> > Cannot we have separate variables managed by specific list
> owners/moderators for this type of user.
>
>
> We can but how does it all fit together and make sense? In a MM 3
> installation we only have one address record for an address regardless
> of how many lists it is a member of, and if that address is bouncing on
> one list, presumably it will bounce on all lists. So do we want to keep
> track of bounces per address per list and disable delivery per list, or
> does it make more sense to keep track of bounces per address and disable
> all delivery to the address?
>
> --
> Mark Sapiro <m...@msapiro.net>        The highway is for gamblers,
> San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan
> _______________________________________________
> Mailman-Developers mailing list -- mailman-developers@python.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-developers-le...@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-developers.python.org/
> Mailman FAQ: https://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
>
> Security Policy: https://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
>
_______________________________________________
Mailman-Developers mailing list -- mailman-developers@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-developers-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-developers.python.org/
Mailman FAQ: https://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3

Security Policy: https://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9

Reply via email to