Chihurumnaya Ibiam via Mailman-users writes:
 > On Fri, Feb 6, 2026 at 7:57?AM Stephen J. Turnbull <[email protected]>
 > wrote:

 > Going by your earlier assumption that perhaps the same thing
 > doesn't happen for mailbox_transport, how would I use that as a
 > fallback in such cases?
[...]
 > mailbox_transport currently doesn't have a value.

Just use the normal configuration for local recipients:

local_recipient_maps =
    proxy:unix:passwd.byname
    $alias_maps
    hash:/path/to/postfix_lmtp

# default, I put aliases in /etc/postfix
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
# you may want to set
virtual_alias_maps =

 > No, weblate isn't supposed to receive email. It runs a service that
 > sends emails just like MM3.  Yes, postfix is also the MTA at
 > weblate.

OK, then what "lists" is trying to send to "weblate" is probably a DSN
(Delivery Status Notice).  I would put any addresses that are
authorized to send to mailing lists in a table in virtual_alias_maps
and send them to a local mailbox.  The local mailbox can be either a
user's mailbox (such as root or mailman) or it could be aliased to a
file.

 > I can include subdomains, but I don't see a reason for doing so at
 > the moment.

OK

 > One thing I had done to remediate the error - which didn't do
 > anything from the logs - is add check_client_access
 > hash:/etc/postfix/client_access in smtpd_client_restrictions.

That is what allows remote MTAs to talk to your local Postfix.  The
message in the log was *outgoing*.

 > I don't know why Postorious and Hyperkitty didn't show up at the time, but
 > I just ran lsof and this is the output;
 > $ lsof -i [email protected] -i 'TCP@[::1]' | grep 24
[...]
 > Which shows the expected ports being listened on, I'll assume the
 > issue with Postorious was probably because the mailmanweb service
 > stopped at some point

OK, the listeners are there as expected and I think you're right, you
just ran lsof the last time when the web UIs were stopped.

 > > I don't have an idea what's going on yet.  The mail you see being
 > > sent in the logs, is that to a gmail address?  Or is it a
 > > sugarlabs.org address?  (Both of these seem to be problematic at
 > > the moment.)

 > It was to a sugarlabs.org address, I've been able to receive mail
 > owner messages to my inbox, I configured a gmail address as the
 > admin for Mailman suite, which indicates that mail delivery works
 > as expected.

Hm.  That doesn't help me figure out what's happening.  We'll see if
the changes so far help.

 > Yes, this probably because I haven't properly configured user
 > lookup on dovecot.
[...]
 > At the moment, I've disabled the service and have no configurations
 > for it.  I commented out my earlier configs before disabling it.

Just getting dovecot out of the loop should help a lot.  Deleting the
mailman_transport setting and setting Mailman's lmtp_port to 8024
should clear up most list-traffic problems.

 > All the configurations that are supposed to contain the FQDN does;
 > mydestination, mydomain, myhostname.
 > 
 > Am I missing any?

I don't think so.  I think I mentioned earlier that the shortname
might be a mail client setting Message-ID, not Postfix.

Regards,
Steve

-- 
GNU Mailman consultant (installation, migration, customization)
Sirius Open Source    https://www.siriusopensource.com/
Software systems consulting in Europe, North America, and Japan
_______________________________________________
Mailman-users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/
Archived at: 
https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/GEDDRZQY55PK45YVVTIOQ7WTWYW6TAFL/

This message sent to [email protected]

Reply via email to