>>>>> "BF" == Bryan Fullerton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
BF> When I get a chance later today I'll be trying the patch Tokio
BF> Kikuchi sent to mailman-developers - hopefully it will resolve
BF> the excess headers issue.
I'm off the net at the moment so I can't look at the patch, but I can
guess what it does. If I'm right <wink> will it bother folks that
reducing the number of headers in the plain text digest will also
reduce the number of headers in the MIME digest?
One of my goals for the digester was that either digest could be burst
and the individual messages would look exactly as if they had arrived
independently. Or at least, they'd be useable to do follow ups back
to the list. Maybe that's unreasonable for plain text digests. If
so, the current code may need a more invasive surgery.
-Barry
------------------------------------------------------
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
This message was sent to: archive@jab.org
Unsubscribe or change your options at
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
