Hi, Barry. Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
"BF" == Bryan Fullerton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:BF> When I get a chance later today I'll be trying the patch Tokio BF> Kikuchi sent to mailman-developers - hopefully it will resolve BF> the excess headers issue.I'm off the net at the moment so I can't look at the patch, but I can guess what it does. If I'm right <wink> will it bother folks that reducing the number of headers in the plain text digest will also reduce the number of headers in the MIME digest?
No. I didn't touch the MIME part of the digester. Only plain text headers are reduced (and cofigurable in mm_cfg.py).
One of my goals for the digester was that either digest could be burst and the individual messages would look exactly as if they had arrived independently. Or at least, they'd be useable to do follow ups back to the list. Maybe that's unreasonable for plain text digests. If so, the current code may need a more invasive surgery.
After I submitted the patch, I had a chance to review Scrubber.py. I think I have re-invented a scrubber with less capablity. Maybe we should use the Scrubber.py for plain text digests. -- Tokio Kikuchi, tkikuchi@ is.kochi-u.ac.jp http://weather.is.kochi-u.ac.jp/ ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ This message was sent to: archive@jab.org Unsubscribe or change your options at http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
