Can you confirm you mean that the per-list htdig directories of the following form are being created:

$prefix/archives/private/<listname>/htdig are being created

and that inside each of them there is a file named <listname>.conf

Is there also a file called rundig_last_run and a bunch of ,db files in any of these per list directories?


Yes, all of that did get created.

and if I manually perform a search (htsearch -c <blah>)


While htsearch is used for index searching, it is not called directly from the form on the list TOC page with the integration but via the $prefix/Mailman/Cgi/mmsearch.py script.

When you run htsearch -c are you specifying the configuration file path as:

$prefix/archives/private/<listname>/htdig/<listname>.conf


Yes.

, I do get output and results.


How have the search indexes being used by htsearch when you run it by hand been built? Did you run nightly_htdig by hand?


Yes.


What form do the URLs of search hits in the response returned by htsearch take?


Well, they look like:
htsearch -c htdig/test.conf
Enter value for words: test
Content-type: text/html

Enter value for format:
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<html><head><title>Search results for 'test'</title></head>
<body bgcolor="#eef7ff">
<....snip....>
<hr noshade size="1">
<img src="/htdig/star.gif" alt="*"><img src="/htdig/star.gif" alt="*"><img src="/htdig/star.gif" alt="*"><img src="/htdig/star.gif" alt="*"> <strong><a href="http://lists.wesmo.com/mailman/htdig/test/2003-August/000029.html";>[Test] test </a></strong><br>
<....snip....>


However, I am not getting the search form at the top of the index.html page as is supposed to happen. So, as expected, I cannot search via the web interface. :(


The trigger for this form to be added to a list's archive TOC page is a new message being sent to that particular list. And until nightly_htidg has been run (which can be done from the command lien as well as by cron) no per-list search indexes will be in existence. Are these criteria being met and yet still the form does not appear on a list's archive TOC page?


Yes.  I first added the following to my mm_cfg.py:
USE_HTDIG = 0    # 0 - don't use integrated htdig, 1 - use it
HTDIG_FILES_URL = '/htdig/'
HTDIG_CONF_LINK_DIR = os.path.join(VAR_PREFIX, 'archives', 'htdig')
HTDIG_HTSEARCH_PATH = '/usr/bin/htsearch'
HTDIG_RUNDIG_PATH = '/usr/bin/rundig'


Then I changed "USE_HTDIG" to 1 and restarted the qrunner (just for the sake of sanity. :). I then sent a message to the test list. At once I got the message that was sent to the test list, I checked out the archives/private/test directory and saw that the timestamp on index.html was updated, that a directory called htdig was created, and there were a bunch of files (db.*, rundig_last_run, and test.conf) in that htdig directory.


Does line 757 (or thereabouts) of $prefix/Mailman/Archiver/HyperArch.py contain the following text:

d["htsearch"] = quick_maketext('TOC_htsearch.html', dict=h,

This is the code that generates the form that is added to the html of the list's TOC page a few lines further on. If this line is missing then the patching has failed somehow.


I just checked, and it is there. Is the TOC_htsearch.html file supposed to be in a particular location? It is in templates/en/ right now...

I *believe* I followed the htdig docs to the letter,


Do you mean the INSTALL.htdig-mm document in the Mailman build directory?


Yup.. that, and the docs on the website.

I swear it seems like I missed something simple (and stupid) here.. I even confirmed that the permissions on the directory and all files were set correctly (owner & group, too!).

Thanks!
-Rich


------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/

This message was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe or change your options at
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Reply via email to