On Wed, 2003-10-01 at 09:13, Jon Carnes wrote: > It is really a shame that they are not included in the original Source > Code. I think in our last straw poll of the users, the consensus of the > group was overwhelmingly in favor of rolling your code into the Source.
I imagine that Barry has not included the htdig patch because it has not been determined whether htdig is the optimum solution. Just wondering if anyone has done a comparison of htdig to other search tools such as mnogosearch? But I also sense that Barry is reluctant to merge a completely separate package period. Another case in point, MHonarc. And on reflection I don't think this is completely unreasonable. It might be better to find ways to get Mailman to *more easily cooperate* with external packages such as htdig and MHonarc for those who wish to use those tools. But I do not see any reason why Richard's patch to allow the editing of messages sent to a moderated list has not been rolled into Mailman. This is a feature that many people would like to see and it does not involve the integration of a standalone product. Barry, whaddaya say about the "edit moderated messages" patch? Can this be done? - Kevin ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ This message was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe or change your options at http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
