On Wednesday, October 1, 2003, at 04:25 pm, Kevin McCann wrote:
On Wed, 2003-10-01 at 09:13, Jon Carnes wrote:
It is really a shame that they are not included in the original Source
Code. I think in our last straw poll of the users, the consensus of the
group was overwhelmingly in favor of rolling your code into the Source.
I imagine that Barry has not included the htdig patch because it has not
been determined whether htdig is the optimum solution. Just wondering if
anyone has done a comparison of htdig to other search tools such as
mnogosearch? But I also sense that Barry is reluctant to merge a
completely separate package period. Another case in point, MHonarc. And
on reflection I don't think this is completely unreasonable. It might be
better to find ways to get Mailman to *more easily cooperate* with
external packages such as htdig and MHonarc for those who wish to use
those tools.
But I do not see any reason why Richard's patch to allow the editing of
messages sent to a moderated list has not been rolled into Mailman. This
is a feature that many people would like to see and it does not involve
the integration of a standalone product.
I cannot claim credit for a patch "to allow editing of messages sent to a moderated list". Sounds neat but it is not one of mine.
Barry, whaddaya say about the "edit moderated messages" patch? Can this be done?
Probably best to identify the patch with its sourceforge tracker number if you want to get BW to act.
- Kevin
----------------------------------------------------------------------- Richard Barrett http://www.openinfo.co.uk
------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
This message was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe or change your options at http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
