On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 10:34:16PM -0500, Jon Carnes wrote:
> So ArchRunner is the one... not too surprising. And the other Qrunners
> are all behaving themselves?
The rest are fine for CPU usage.
> You should upgrade to the latest version of Mailman, it does fix some
> problems with the ArchRunner.
I'm using the latest version available in Debian, is it worth reporting
this bug to the Debian maintainer, telling him it's been fixed upstream?
> And paste it into your ~mailman/Mailman/mm_py.cfg file, then delete the
> line with ArchRunner:
> ('ArchRunner', 1), # messages for the archiver
Thanks, that fixed the CPU problem for now.
> I'm curious if your lists are actually being archived? Are the messages
> making it into the archives?
Yes, the archiver is working fine (aside from the CPU part!)
--
Adam Kessel
http://adam.rosi-kessel.org
------------------------------------------------------
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
This message was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe or change your options at
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
