Yes, these are posts from the list, actually they are any post to any list from people at this company... I don't understand how this could happen either, but the only thing I can think is different between one of their posts and all others is the header...
On 2/5/05 12:47 PM, "Mark Sapiro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Chris Malatesta wrote: >> >> I have setup a new mailman server for a client (RHE3/netmail 1.0.5/Mailman >> 2.1.5) when people from one domain running qmail post to a newly created >> list with the default options, the subject_prefix doesnąt get added to the >> subject line, but it does for everyone else??? > > I assume you're sure you're seeing a message from the list and not a > direct Cc: > >> The only thing I can think could be different is the header of the email, >> There are some differences with mail from this domain, which I donąt believe >> should be this way, but not sure if this is what causes the problem.. > > I can't see how this would affect prefixing as long as the message > processing is otherwise normal. > >> Any ideas would be appreciated. >> >> Chris >> >> >> I.e. Here is a header from this domain, with the actual address names and >> ip's changed. >> >> Received: from domain.com ([55.255.255.255]) by otherdomain.com with >> Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); >> Wed, 2 Feb 2005 17:30:07 -0800 >> Received: (qmail 508 invoked by uid 14282); 3 Feb 2005 01:33:53 -0000 >> Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by domain.com by uid 505 with >> qmail-scanner-1.22 >> (avp: 5.0.2.0. f-prot: 3.12/. Clear:RC:1(10.250.100.83):. >> Processed in 0.557572 secs); 03 Feb 2005 01:33:53 -0000 >> Received: from in.domain.com (HELO usersname) (10.250.100.83) >> ^^ > > This is how the user's MUA or webmail or whatever identified itself. It > should not be significant as long as the receiver accepted the mail. > >> by 0 with SMTP; 3 Feb 2005 01:33:53 -0000 >> Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> From: "First Last" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "'First Last'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Subject: Same Problem >> Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 17:34:44 -0800 >> Organization: Company Name >> >>>> AND THE ID HAS THE USERS NAME HERE INSTEAD OF THE DOMAIN NAME >> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>> ^^^ > > This is not a problem either. This is generated by the user's MUA and > is not required to be a domain name. Look at the Message-ID: in this > mail from me. It will be of the form > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with differences just left > of the @. The "msapiro" to the right of the @ looks like a user name > (actually it's a machine name), and it's never been a problem. > >> >> MIME-Version: 1.0 >> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; >> boundary="----=_NextPart_000_012C_01C5094D.7ED0EBC0" >> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) >> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal >> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 >> Importance: Normal >> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 >> X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.500000, version=0.17.5 >> Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Feb 2005 01:30:08.0062 (UTC) >> FILETIME=[E53905E0:01C5098F] > > -- > Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The highway is for gamblers, > San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan > ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org