Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Yes. Your analysis seems correct. Mailman generated messages are always
> sent from <the site list>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> The only thing that puzzles me is that should also be true for the
> relay of the messages you sent to -owner so why did they go through?
> If you send a message to -owner, what do you see in the received
> message in any Return-Path: or Sender: headers?

Now we're getting somewhere...

Below is the full content of a message I just sent to 
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]". See if this logic makes sense:

1) -owner has worked all along. Looking at the message, the Return-Path: 
is "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". cheiron is the name of the shared 
server my site is on. I suspect SMTP is configured to allow 
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" as a sender.

2) My test yesterday showed that "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" (my own 
domain) was being rejected as a sender.

Is it possible that Mailman is using these two different addresses for 
the -owner and -admin situations? Would that explain why one has been 
working and the other not?

Kris

***********

Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 14:13:31 -0400
Received: from reefnetc by cheiron.multisite.site5.com with local-bsmtp 
(Exim 4.52)
        id 1FZAzb-0000OP-9e
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 14:13:31 -0400
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on
        cheiron.multisite.site5.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,
        USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham version=3.1.1
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=cheiron.multisite.site5.com)
        by cheiron.multisite.site5.com with esmtp (Exim 4.52)
        id 1FZAzb-0000OJ-0M
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 14:13:31 -0400
Received: from [70.24.174.109] (helo=[192.168.1.99])
        by cheiron.multisite.site5.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
        (Exim 4.52) id 1FZAzY-0000Nh-Sr
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 14:13:29 -0400
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 14:13:39 -0400
From: Kris Wilk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: ReefNet Inc.
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Test message to fubar-owner
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Antivirus-Scanner: This message has been scanned by ClamAV.
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Antivirus-Scanner: This message has been scanned by ClamAV.

This is a test.
------------------------------------------------------
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: 
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&amp;file=faq01.027.htp

Reply via email to