Watching this with interest; a newbie learns... On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 01:27:40PM -0500, Neal Groothuis wrote:
<snip> > It might be appropriate for Mailman to add Resent-* headers, depending > on how one reads RFC 2822, 3.6.6. I personally don't think it's > necessary or useful, since list servers add their own List-* headers, > per RFC 2369. The Resent-* headers seem to exist for individuals > resending messages, not automated systems. This is supported by the > RFC: "Resent fields are used to identify a message as having been > reintroduced into the transport system by a user." How does the RFC, or the writers thereof, define "user"? An automated system is the tool of some deliberate intent, implying (necessarily?) the will of a "user", I would think. Or is this relevant? Thanks for reading. Bill Tallman ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp
