At 1:30 PM -0700 4/19/07, David Southwell wrote:

>  UMPh - nothing like the circumstances referred to in any of the FAQ,s which
>  focus on the need for reauthentication . The circumstances I describe, have
>  nothing to do with that issue as the need for re-authorization does not
>  occur.

Those FAQ entries relate to changes being made in the user interface, 
but not being saved by Mailman, and this kind of problem can have a 
number of different causes.

I referenced those FAQ entries because your problem sounded vaguely 
similar, albeit not identical.

>  This seems to be a bug where the [list-owner_ID] is not being properly
>  maintained. I realize I have a possible clue that may help someone who is
>  familiar with mailman's logic. The original email address for the owner was
>  given in error. It was an email address that would not have been validatable!
>  Does that help anyone to get to the bottom of this?

That's as far as I can go.  Maybe Mark or Tokio will have more luck.

-- 
Brad Knowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Consultant & Author
LinkedIn Profile: <http://tinyurl.com/y8kpxu>
Slides from Invited Talks: <http://tinyurl.com/tj6q4>
------------------------------------------------------
Mailman-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: 
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&amp;file=faq01.027.htp

Reply via email to