On 19 Jun 2008, at 15:53, Mark Sapiro wrote:

[...] You have said in another thread that these links contribute to excessive verbosity of the labels, but they often link to useful supplemental information.

I don’t dispute that. I am sure there are lots of useful info there, but it drowns in the excessive verbosity. Take the reply-to UI in question:

                            Reply-To: header munging

       Should any existing Reply-To: header
           found in the original message be
         stripped? If so, this will be done  (o) No  ( ) Yes
           regardless of whether an explict
    Reply-To: header is added by Mailman or
           not. (Edit first_strip_reply_to)

         Where are replies to list messages
   directed? Poster is strongly recommended  (o) Poster  ( ) This list
       for most mailing lists. (Details for  ( ) Explicit address
                        reply_goes_to_list)

Explicit Reply-To: header. (Details for [ ]
                          reply_to_address)

That’s almost 100 words and the link that explains why the Poster option is recommended bears the mundane title of “(Details for reply_goes_to_list)” and is part of a label which is really 3 sentences.

Here is how I would change all of the above:

     List replies go to: (o) Poster (recommended, more info)
                         ( ) The list
                              [x] Strip existing Reply-To header
                         ( ) Other: [                           ]

The grouping should make it clear how the settings relate to each other, so no need for long explanations about the explicit Reply-To address etc.¹

Less text means better chance the user will read/grasp it. I only added one “more info” link and put it right next to the ‘recommended’ text, so it should be clear from context that it will elaborate on why this is the recommended setting.



¹ The third setting is dependent on list replies going to the list and while it indicates that the first setting can be used even for replies sent to poster, that does IMHO not make much sense.


------------------------------------------------------
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: 
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp

Reply via email to