Allan Odgaard wrote: > >Here is how I would change all of the above: > > List replies go to: (o) Poster (recommended, more info) > ( ) The list > [x] Strip existing Reply-To header > ( ) Other: [ ] > >The grouping should make it clear how the settings relate to each >other, so no need for long explanations about the explicit Reply-To >address etc. > >Less text means better chance the user will read/grasp it. I only >added one "more info" link and put it right next to the recommended >text, so it should be clear from context that it will elaborate on why >this is the recommended setting.
I really don't want to get into a discussion of the web UI here. I am not directly involved in the changes that are going on, and I think the wiki <http://wiki.list.org/x/RoBE> and the mailman-developers list are more appropriate for this discussion. However, I certainly agree that your suggested improvement above is more readable and user friendly except that it doesn't correctly capture the interrelated settings. The first_strip_reply_to setting is independent and while it doesn't make sense for 'poster', it certainly does for 'other' -- Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp
