Brad Knowles wrote: >Matt Hoskins wrote: > >> 1) Be able to configure the "-request" auto responder to not reply if >> there were no valid commands included in the message (the spammers >> aren't spamming with valid commands at the moment) > >That sounds like a really good idea. > >> 2) Be able to configure the "-request" auto responder to not reply to >> non-members > >Not so sure about this one, but it might also be an idea to consider. > > >However, I'm not a Mailman developer, so I can't really speak to how easy it >would be to add such features. That might be a discussion to have over on >the mailman-developers list.
Speaking as a developer, we are aware of the spam reflection/backscatter issues with Mailman, and we want to address them. Steps will be taken in Mailman 2.2 to at least reduce this problem. Thanks for your ideas, and as Brad suggests, if you want to follow up on [email protected] or submit further suggestions, we'd be happy to get them. -- Mark Sapiro <[email protected]> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
