On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 15:01 -0800, Mark Sapiro wrote: > Brad Knowles wrote: > > >Matt Hoskins wrote: > > > >> 1) Be able to configure the "-request" auto responder to not reply if > >> there were no valid commands included in the message (the spammers > >> aren't spamming with valid commands at the moment) > > > >That sounds like a really good idea. > > > >> 2) Be able to configure the "-request" auto responder to not reply to > >> non-members > > > >Not so sure about this one, but it might also be an idea to consider. > > > > > Speaking as a developer, we are aware of the spam > reflection/backscatter issues with Mailman, and we want to address > them. Steps will be taken in Mailman 2.2 to at least reduce this > problem. > > Thanks for your ideas, and as Brad suggests, if you want to follow up > on [email protected] or submit further suggestions, we'd > be happy to get them.
Thanks for the reply - reassuring to know 2.2 is going to improve the situation :). If any further ideas spring to mind I'll be sure to post 'em. Matt ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
