You wrote:

> Which indicates Postfix is not seeing that mail to lists.my.dom is
> using the mailman transport.

Right.

> Have you added hash:/etc/mailman/transport to transport_maps in
> main.cf? have you run "postmap /etc/mailman/transport" to update
> /etc/mailman/transport.db?

Yes I have, and I restarted mailman and postfix.

> Those have no effect on postfix_to_mailman.py delivery. You should have
> MTA = None.

OK, done.

> postfix_to_mailman.py is a third party module officially unsupported by
> the GNU Mailman project. Maybe if everyone who had problems making
> their Debian/Ubuntu installation work with postfix_to_mailman.py went
> to Debian for support instead of coming here, Debian wold fix the
> package or improve the documentation or whatever is necessary to avoid
> these problems.

<em>  Sorry; I had no idea of this, I'm just trying to get the system to work 
with mailman.  Obviously it is possible, and if I can get it done I'll be 
happy to contribute documentation.

After re-setting things as you mentioned above, and restarting the daemons, I 
sent an email to my test list.  Here is the relevant mail.log:

postfix/smtpd[16482]: connect from unknown[192.168.18.100]
postfix/smtpd[16482]: setting up TLS connection from unknown[192.168.18.100]
postfix/smtpd[16482]: Anonymous TLS connection established from 
unknown[192.168.18.100]: TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)    
                                                                                
        
postfix/smtpd[16482]: C73305415EF: client=unknown[192.168.18.100], 
sasl_method=PLAIN, [email protected]                                    
                                                                                
 
postfix/cleanup[16486]: C73305415EF: message-id=<[email protected]>
postfix/qmgr[16475]: C73305415EF: from=<[email protected]>, size=691, nrcpt=1 (queue 
active)
spamd[5057]: spamd: connection from localhost [127.0.0.1] at port 33232
spamd[5057]: spamd: setuid to vmail succeeded
spamd[5057]: spamd: processing message <[email protected]> for 
vmail:5000
spamd[5057]: spamd: clean message (-1.0/5.0) for vmail:5000 in 3.3 seconds, 
673 bytes.
spamd[5057]: spamd: result: . -1 - ALL_TRUSTED 
scantime=3.3,size=673,user=vmail,uid=5000,required_score=5.0,rhost=localhost,raddr=127.0.0.1,rport=33232,mid=<[email protected]>,autolearn=ham
postfix/pickup[16474]: 5C9BB541603: uid=5000 from=<[email protected]>
postfix/pipe[16487]: C73305415EF: to=<[email protected]>, relay=spamassassin, 
delay=3.6, delays=0.19/0.01/0/3.4, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (delivered via 
spamassassin service)
postfix/qmgr[16475]: C73305415EF: removed
postfix/cleanup[16486]: 5C9BB541603: message-id=<[email protected]>
spamd[5056]: prefork: child states: II
postfix/qmgr[16475]: 5C9BB541603: from=<[email protected]>, size=981, nrcpt=1 (queue 
active)
postfix/pipe[16492]: 5C9BB541603: to=<[email protected]>, 
orig_to=<[email protected]>, relay=maildrop, delay=0.32, 
delays=0.2/0.01/0/0.12, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (delivered via maildrop 
service)
postfix/qmgr[16475]: 5C9BB541603: removed
postfix/smtpd[16482]: disconnect from unknown[192.168.18.100]


Note that lists.my.dom seems to get mapped to just my.dom and no mention of 
mailman appears here (I assume I would see some mailman logging going on 
here).  The /var/log/mailman/qrunner log only shows it was restart.

So the question is why would postfix not be passing the connection on to 
mailman?  Is there another 'transport' key I should use, perhaps, or maybe one 
of the 'filter' keys?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

------------------------------------------------------
Mailman-Users mailing list [email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Reply via email to