On 2/3/2011 10:54 PM, Ron Aaron wrote: > > After re-setting things as you mentioned above, and restarting the daemons, I > sent an email to my test list. Here is the relevant mail.log: > > postfix/smtpd[16482]: connect from unknown[192.168.18.100] > postfix/smtpd[16482]: setting up TLS connection from unknown[192.168.18.100] > postfix/smtpd[16482]: Anonymous TLS connection established from > unknown[192.168.18.100]: TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits) > > > postfix/smtpd[16482]: C73305415EF: client=unknown[192.168.18.100], > sasl_method=PLAIN, [email protected] > > > postfix/cleanup[16486]: C73305415EF: > message-id=<[email protected]> > postfix/qmgr[16475]: C73305415EF: from=<[email protected]>, size=691, nrcpt=1 > (queue > active) > spamd[5057]: spamd: connection from localhost [127.0.0.1] at port 33232 > spamd[5057]: spamd: setuid to vmail succeeded > spamd[5057]: spamd: processing message <[email protected]> for > vmail:5000 > spamd[5057]: spamd: clean message (-1.0/5.0) for vmail:5000 in 3.3 seconds, > 673 bytes. > spamd[5057]: spamd: result: . -1 - ALL_TRUSTED > scantime=3.3,size=673,user=vmail,uid=5000,required_score=5.0,rhost=localhost,raddr=127.0.0.1,rport=33232,mid=<[email protected]>,autolearn=ham > postfix/pickup[16474]: 5C9BB541603: uid=5000 from=<[email protected]> > postfix/pipe[16487]: C73305415EF: to=<[email protected]>, relay=spamassassin, > delay=3.6, delays=0.19/0.01/0/3.4, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (delivered via > spamassassin service) > postfix/qmgr[16475]: C73305415EF: removed > postfix/cleanup[16486]: 5C9BB541603: > message-id=<[email protected]> > spamd[5056]: prefork: child states: II > postfix/qmgr[16475]: 5C9BB541603: from=<[email protected]>, size=981, nrcpt=1 > (queue > active) > postfix/pipe[16492]: 5C9BB541603: to=<[email protected]>, > orig_to=<[email protected]>, relay=maildrop, delay=0.32, > delays=0.2/0.01/0/0.12, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (delivered via maildrop > service) > postfix/qmgr[16475]: 5C9BB541603: removed > postfix/smtpd[16482]: disconnect from unknown[192.168.18.100] > > > Note that lists.my.dom seems to get mapped to just my.dom and no mention of > mailman appears here (I assume I would see some mailman logging going on > here). The /var/log/mailman/qrunner log only shows it was restart. > > So the question is why would postfix not be passing the connection on to > mailman? Is there another 'transport' key I should use, perhaps, or maybe > one > of the 'filter' keys?
It may have something to do with passing through spamassassin, but I don't think so because queue id 5C9BB541603 is the message after spamassassin and it notes orig_to=<[email protected]>. However, I'm not sure why the message is handled by Postfix's pipe module. That seems odd. If you post the output of postconf -n, we may be able to help further. -- Mark Sapiro <[email protected]> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
