Mark Sapiro wrote at
<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2012-November/074415.html>:

> I have implemented a simple version of what I think you requested in
> your post at
> <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2012-October/074287.html>.
> 
> It is implemented by the attached patch against Mailman 2.1.15.


I have augmented that patch with a timestamp and it now also checks that
the hash is no older than mm_cfg.FORM_LIFETIME. See
<https://launchpad.net/bugs/1082746> and
<http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mailman-coders/mailman/2.1/revision/1371>
for a bug report and the patch which will be released with Mailman 2.1.16.

-- 
Mark Sapiro <m...@msapiro.net>        The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan

------------------------------------------------------
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Reply via email to