On 8/4/2017 2:32 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>> My theory is that MS is (wrongly) dropping the "To" copy of list1 from
>> the reply because it's the From, and then (correctly) using the Reply-To
>> instead of the From.
> It looks to me as if your theory is correct, except I wouldn't say
> "wrongly". I think an MUA is arguably doing the right thing by
> overriding the From: address with the Reply-To: address on a reply-all
> even though the From: address is also in To:.
It should certainly override the From with the Reply-To.
What I'm objecting to is the fact that it hunts down *other* instances
of the address in From and removes them (or perhaps replaces them with
the Reply-To and then eliminates duplicates). I think Reply-All should
take {Reply-To, else From}, To, and CC, and reply to them.
------------------------------------------------------
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
