On Thursday 19 October 2017, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > As Mark says, they should use an @sysadmins.irs.gov address or > something like that, which would have its own p=none policy. Note > that this has been already standard practice at Yahoo! (!), AOL (!!), > LinkedIn, and several banks that participate in IETF discussions. > Since 2013 for Yahoo! and LinkedIn IIRC.
So if enough users of Yahoo and AOL requested something such as u...@list.aol.com to not be DMARC p=reject they /might/ listen? Only list I help administer the owner simply moderates the few remaining hold outs who can not switch and manually re-posts their messages. Would not have worked back when the list was busy... Think I now understand the correct fix but did not a few years ago when this mess started and that was the solution we came up with. -- William ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
